Short and Sweet
Our last Council meeting before the Christmas break (Municipal Hall will be closed between December 25th and January 4th) was relatively short, with a light agenda. None of us was complaining, given the last busy year of jam-packed agendas, challenging issues and many achievements. The December 21st agenda highlights are as follows:
North Saanich resident Bert Slater addressed Council about his concerns related to Ian Vantreight's proposal to build and operate a composting digester for green waste on his farm. Mr. Slater cautioned Mayor and Council about ensuring we get all the information on such a proposal before giving it any further consideration. The Council agreed that industrial use proposed for farmland, as well as an operation involving green waste, requires the oversight of the ALC and the CRD. The CRD is experienced both in running waste operations such as Hartland Landfill and in exploring options through an established regional committee that reports to the CRD Board via the Solid Waste Advisory Committee, a committee composed of municipal representatives from across the CRD.
Correspondence related to derelict boats in Tsehum Harbour was referred to the new Derelict Vessel Task Force, recently established as a result of the Tri-Municipal Council meeting. To my knowledge, two appointments to the Task Force have been made thus far -- Councilors Olsen and Mason from Central Saanich. I understand that North Saanich and Sidney Councils still have to make their appointments, probably early in the New Year.
The Council majority voted to support a request from the CRD Regional Parks Land Acquisition Fund to increase the requisition from $10 to $20 over the next 5 years (2010-2014), with a rate of increase of $2 per year, and then maintained at $20 for the following 5 years (2015-2019). I agreed with other Council members that we need to support such an initiative that enables regional acquisition of new parkland as a legacy for the future.
I have pointed out before that North Saanich has very few of its own parks and does not have significant funds to make frequent or large land purchases for parkland. In my view, the CRD is the ideal partner in parkland acquisition, given that it has access to significant funds and seems committed to seeking out more opportunities to expand its reach. As you know, North Saanich enjoys the benefits of Horth Hill Park, a CRD-owned park that attracts hundreds of visitors a year. The last significant land acquisition by the CRD for a new park was the Island View Beach site, purchased this year.
A letter from the CRD confirming an amendment to the bylaw governing the Regional Housing Trust Fund noted that the 5-year time limit was lifted, signifying that the Trust Fund is now a permanent regional fixture. And so it should be in my view. It is a major regional success story in the quest for social and affordable housing, primarily in core municipalities where transportation and amenities are plentiful. CRD staff who work with the Trust and are linked to the CRD's Regional Housing Corporation Board should be congratulated for their amazing ability to leverage municipal funds into millions of dollars that help the CRD purchase and operate below market housing that benefits so many who would otherwise be unable to live in decent accommodation. I wish CRD staff continued success with this program and I feel privileged to represent North Saanich on both the Regional Housing Trust Fund Board and on the Housing Corporation Board.
Councilor Anny Scoones made a number of motions, one of which requested Council to refer to the Environmental Advisory Commission, Mr. Vantreight's green box and composting proposal, mentioned earlier. I could not support this motion and it was later defeated. I pointed out that this should be a regional initiative by the CRD, where regional accountability and municipal oversight are fundamental to programs that involve waste recovery. Public health and safety are also important in waste disposal and local government has the infrastructure to manage any issues that might threaten the public. Furthermore, not only is Mr. Vantreight's proposal a Central Saanich municipal responsibility, the role of our Environmental Advisory Commission is specific to North Saanich land use so what would be their purpose in reviewing Mr. Vantreight's green box proposal? The motion was defeated unanimously. Councilor Scoones other motions related to her resolutions about derelict vessels and agriculture for referral to next year's AVICC Convention passed.
HOLIDAY MESSAGE
I would like to take this opportunity to wish North Saanich residents and their families and loved ones a joyful, peaceful and safe Holiday Season.
The time flew by this year and I am proud of what this Mayor and Council majority have achieved working together on your behalf. Mayor Finall has shown, in my view, strong leadership and grace under pressure and I look forward to serving with her again next year. THANK YOU for your support during the past year and thanks to all my faithful blog readers. All the best to you and to yours for 2010!
I look forward to seeing you and hearing from you in the New Year. This blog is now on holiday until January 4, 2010. Take care.
Deep Cove Student in Canadian Finals!
The following note is from a teacher at Deep Cove Elementary. One of his students is in the Canadian finals. Please read his message and consider voting for Wynn.
My name is Philip Jungen. I'm a teacher at Deep Cove Elementary in North Saanich.
As part of a class project, my students entered the Genworth Financial "Meaning of Home" Essay contest. One of my students is now in the Canadian finals, and I was wondering if you could help in getting the word out to your staff and volunteers to vote online. It's as simple as "winning a house with a click of your mouse." It could be as simple as forwarding the message (below) to your staff email contact list. This is an easy way to provide funding to build a home for a needy family right here in our own community - just like the H for H homes on Resthaven in Sidney did for women, men, and families in need. See below for all of the information. Thanks in advance, and I'd like to wish all of you the very best of the holiday season.
Habitat for Humanity - Congratulations Wynn Toronitz
Deep Cove Elementary School grade five student Wynn Toronitz has been selected as one of 24 finalists and one of only 4 from the Pacific region for his essay about the true meaning of home. Selected from over 2000 Canadian entries, Wynn’s writing is now eligible to win the ultimate gift - a $5000 contribution for making the final 6, or a $60 000 grand prize contribution to build a new Habitat for Humanity home for a deserving family right here in our own community. Wynn’s story is posted online at: http://www.meaningofhome.ca and just follow the links.
Winners are determined through online voting - maximum of 14 votes per person. Students, teachers, parents and members of the general public may vote for their favourite entries until Thursday evening, December 24. We encourage you to read Wynn's story, describing how a house isn't merely a building, but a home where memories are made and dreams begin. Good luck in the voting Wynn!
This is a fabulous opportunity for the Peninsula to rally together in support of Wynn, and participate in the online voting. What a great way, right before Christmas, to help Habitat for Humanity Victoria provide a home for a deserving family.
My name is Philip Jungen. I'm a teacher at Deep Cove Elementary in North Saanich.
As part of a class project, my students entered the Genworth Financial "Meaning of Home" Essay contest. One of my students is now in the Canadian finals, and I was wondering if you could help in getting the word out to your staff and volunteers to vote online. It's as simple as "winning a house with a click of your mouse." It could be as simple as forwarding the message (below) to your staff email contact list. This is an easy way to provide funding to build a home for a needy family right here in our own community - just like the H for H homes on Resthaven in Sidney did for women, men, and families in need. See below for all of the information. Thanks in advance, and I'd like to wish all of you the very best of the holiday season.
Habitat for Humanity - Congratulations Wynn Toronitz
Deep Cove Elementary School grade five student Wynn Toronitz has been selected as one of 24 finalists and one of only 4 from the Pacific region for his essay about the true meaning of home. Selected from over 2000 Canadian entries, Wynn’s writing is now eligible to win the ultimate gift - a $5000 contribution for making the final 6, or a $60 000 grand prize contribution to build a new Habitat for Humanity home for a deserving family right here in our own community. Wynn’s story is posted online at: http://www.meaningofhome.ca and just follow the links.
Winners are determined through online voting - maximum of 14 votes per person. Students, teachers, parents and members of the general public may vote for their favourite entries until Thursday evening, December 24. We encourage you to read Wynn's story, describing how a house isn't merely a building, but a home where memories are made and dreams begin. Good luck in the voting Wynn!
This is a fabulous opportunity for the Peninsula to rally together in support of Wynn, and participate in the online voting. What a great way, right before Christmas, to help Habitat for Humanity Victoria provide a home for a deserving family.
Dec. 14th Council Highlights - A Night of Presentations
Friends of Dominion Brook Park
Board member and gardener Joan Gibb made a brief presentation on the Board's Rhodo Ravine re-vitalization project to support their request of North Saanich for up to $8,000. to complete the project. Dominion Brook Park is a unique 11-acre park created by the Canadian Department of Agriculture in 1913 as a demonstration project and ornamental garden for the public's enjoyment. Species in the Park are plantings originating from around the world and most notably, there are rhododendrons from the Arnold Arboretum at Harvard University that were raised from seed collected in Western China in the early 20th Century by renowned plant hunter Ernest Wilson. Dominion Brook Park continues to play a vital role in the community and social life of the Saanich Peninsula and exists today because of the tremendous efforts of volunteers known as the Friends of Dominion Brook Park. Through a stewardship agreement with the Federal Government and District of North Saanich, they have volunteered thousands of hours to restore the Park and secure it as a legacy for the future. Dominion Brook Park is a testament to the joint commitment of volunteers and governments to make co-management work. I voted with Mayor and Council to refer this request to our budget deliberations in January 2010.
Memorial Park Society/Mary Winspear Centre
Executive Director Ian Hennigar made a presentation about recent successes at the Mary Winspear Centre, the 2008-2012 business plan and the 2007 Strategic Plan, all to support the Society's ongoing request of North Saanich for permanent funding through an automatic yearly 2% tax requisition. The presentation was detailed and informative and Council congratulated Mr. Hennigar and the Society on their progress since Mr. Hennigar's appointment as Executive Director. Society Board members also attended to hear Mr. Hennigar's presentation and to reinforce the request for year over year stable funding. North Saanich currently provides each year an annual amount of over $120,000. and "in kind" services that include tax exemptions for Blue Heron Park. Our support is determined each year after Council deliberations at budget time. A 2% tax requisition would add to our contribution a significant amount in the tens of thousands. Mr. Hennigar pointed out that Sidney has adopted the 2% funding model and he and the Society believe that North Saanich should do the same. I believe that compared to the Peninsula Recreation Centre, admittedly, North Saanich doesn't fund Mary Winspear to the same level. But I must also point out that the Memorial Park Society is a private entity, is located in Sidney and benefits directly Sidney's commercial business core. I voted with Mayor and Council to refer this request to our budget deliberations in January and to consider a questionnaire for North Residents asking them if they support a 2% tax requisition to support the Mary Winspear Centre and other assets administered by the Memorial Park Society.
Addressing Greenhouse Gas emissions (GHGs) in North Saanich
A plan is underway and was outlined to us by John Munn, a consultant and planner hired by the District to help North Saanich develop plans and policies to reach by 2012, provincial targets under Bill 27, provincial legislation that mandates all municipalities to reduce their emissions and amend their Official Community Plans to reflect such policy. Mr. Munn made a detailed presentation that shows how and why GHGs must be reduced and how to get started. The initial stage of the plan will focus on District corporate operations and a community inventory of existing sources of greenhouse gas. By the way, greenhouse gas includes carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, per-fluorocarbons and sulphur hexafluoride. Mayor and Council are committed to this plan and look forward to further information about our progress as a District as the plan develops and unfolds.
More Than Putting Out Brush Fires
I voted with Council to renew our Fire Services Agreement with the Victoria Airport Authority (VAA), an agreement that has been revised to better reflect the services we provide. Briefly, North Saanich firefighters are responsible for all fire suppression on structures on airport lands and VAA is responsible for aircraft-related fire suppression. The cooperation between North Saanich and the VAA is well established and the relationship works to the benefit of both parties. Our volunteer firefighters enjoy special training experiences related to calls outside airport boundaries that involve aircraft, fuel spills, structural fires, vehicle fires and other fire-related activity normally outside the jurisdiction of North Saanich; this is unique training for sure. The VAA in return has access to highly trained volunteers whose numbers enable the airport to provide wider and more efficient coverage in the event of a fire emergency. This agreement is similar to other agreements already signed between the VAA and Sidney and Central Saanich.
On Land and Sea
I voted with the Council majority to accept a recommendation from the Agricultural Advisory Commission to refer for preliminary review the draft Agricultural Area Plan to legal counsel who has expertise in agriculture. Cost and timelines were two issues raised by other Council members so we requested CAO, Bruce Williams, to explore approximate costs with the lawyer. The draft plan will have to go to a lawyer for review in any case so this recommendation is in keeping with District policy and process, particularly when the Agricultural Area Plan may have implications for changes to our Official Community Plan and zoning bylaws. Mayor and Council are enthusiastic about the Plan, noting that North Saanich leads the CRD in this important work. Stay tuned...
I voted with Council to approve in principle the creation of a regional Task Force to address the thorny issue of derelict vessels in local waters. This item emerged from the Tri-Municipal Council meeting held a few weeks ago after I added it to that agenda. There is a groundswell of public support across our three communities to do something about this problem which poses an environmental hazard to our local waters, never mind the aesthetics, which are also of concern. The big issues that need to be addressed in my view are environmental protection, coordination between and among local, provincial and federal authorities, costs to communities of clean-up, where to take derelict vessels and finding and fining owners who "dump" and abandon their vessels, to name just a few. Municipalities and regional districts seem willing to tackle the problem and show leadership on the issue, provided questions are first answered about authority, jurisdiction and financial support. My hope is that the Task Force will bring together all necessary parties and provide a forum in which to develop a plan that is both effective and sustainable. Janet Rooke of the Tsehum Harbour Authority shares local concerns and has offered to assist the work of a Task Force should it be established and its mandate and structure clarified.
One point I want to make about this issue -- some suggest that the live-aboard community is responsible for the problem of derelict and abandoned vessels, that live-aboards are the real culprits. This is not my experience and I would argue that the criticism is unfair. My husband and I boated for over 30 years and, at one stage, lived aboard our sailboat in the early 1980's, before our son was born. We were both professionals and commuted to and from Victoria to our jobs. We joined a small community of other live-aboards who were established, respected, had jobs and were an integral part of their community. They cared deeply about protecting the marine environment and were often the first people on the dock and on the sea to help other boaters. They provided to marina owners and other boaters a sense of security against vandalism, break-ins and after hours' emergencies.
I hope that during deliberation on this important issue that we remember that live-aboards comprise a largely responsible group who add to the diversity of our local communities. Live-aboards who are moored at marinas pay a substantial monthly moorage, pay for hydro on the dock and pay for other related amenities. They also contribute to local commerce and business. Please, in our haste to blame others, let's not jump to wrong conclusions. I am reminded of the adage, "Jumping to conclusions makes for rough landings."
If you have questions about this initiative, please feel free to contact Councillors Adam Olsen and Susan Mason from Central Saanich and Mayors Alice Finall and Larry Cross from North Saanich and Sidney. Stay tuned for more information about the Task Force...
Board member and gardener Joan Gibb made a brief presentation on the Board's Rhodo Ravine re-vitalization project to support their request of North Saanich for up to $8,000. to complete the project. Dominion Brook Park is a unique 11-acre park created by the Canadian Department of Agriculture in 1913 as a demonstration project and ornamental garden for the public's enjoyment. Species in the Park are plantings originating from around the world and most notably, there are rhododendrons from the Arnold Arboretum at Harvard University that were raised from seed collected in Western China in the early 20th Century by renowned plant hunter Ernest Wilson. Dominion Brook Park continues to play a vital role in the community and social life of the Saanich Peninsula and exists today because of the tremendous efforts of volunteers known as the Friends of Dominion Brook Park. Through a stewardship agreement with the Federal Government and District of North Saanich, they have volunteered thousands of hours to restore the Park and secure it as a legacy for the future. Dominion Brook Park is a testament to the joint commitment of volunteers and governments to make co-management work. I voted with Mayor and Council to refer this request to our budget deliberations in January 2010.
Memorial Park Society/Mary Winspear Centre
Executive Director Ian Hennigar made a presentation about recent successes at the Mary Winspear Centre, the 2008-2012 business plan and the 2007 Strategic Plan, all to support the Society's ongoing request of North Saanich for permanent funding through an automatic yearly 2% tax requisition. The presentation was detailed and informative and Council congratulated Mr. Hennigar and the Society on their progress since Mr. Hennigar's appointment as Executive Director. Society Board members also attended to hear Mr. Hennigar's presentation and to reinforce the request for year over year stable funding. North Saanich currently provides each year an annual amount of over $120,000. and "in kind" services that include tax exemptions for Blue Heron Park. Our support is determined each year after Council deliberations at budget time. A 2% tax requisition would add to our contribution a significant amount in the tens of thousands. Mr. Hennigar pointed out that Sidney has adopted the 2% funding model and he and the Society believe that North Saanich should do the same. I believe that compared to the Peninsula Recreation Centre, admittedly, North Saanich doesn't fund Mary Winspear to the same level. But I must also point out that the Memorial Park Society is a private entity, is located in Sidney and benefits directly Sidney's commercial business core. I voted with Mayor and Council to refer this request to our budget deliberations in January and to consider a questionnaire for North Residents asking them if they support a 2% tax requisition to support the Mary Winspear Centre and other assets administered by the Memorial Park Society.
Addressing Greenhouse Gas emissions (GHGs) in North Saanich
A plan is underway and was outlined to us by John Munn, a consultant and planner hired by the District to help North Saanich develop plans and policies to reach by 2012, provincial targets under Bill 27, provincial legislation that mandates all municipalities to reduce their emissions and amend their Official Community Plans to reflect such policy. Mr. Munn made a detailed presentation that shows how and why GHGs must be reduced and how to get started. The initial stage of the plan will focus on District corporate operations and a community inventory of existing sources of greenhouse gas. By the way, greenhouse gas includes carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, per-fluorocarbons and sulphur hexafluoride. Mayor and Council are committed to this plan and look forward to further information about our progress as a District as the plan develops and unfolds.
More Than Putting Out Brush Fires
I voted with Council to renew our Fire Services Agreement with the Victoria Airport Authority (VAA), an agreement that has been revised to better reflect the services we provide. Briefly, North Saanich firefighters are responsible for all fire suppression on structures on airport lands and VAA is responsible for aircraft-related fire suppression. The cooperation between North Saanich and the VAA is well established and the relationship works to the benefit of both parties. Our volunteer firefighters enjoy special training experiences related to calls outside airport boundaries that involve aircraft, fuel spills, structural fires, vehicle fires and other fire-related activity normally outside the jurisdiction of North Saanich; this is unique training for sure. The VAA in return has access to highly trained volunteers whose numbers enable the airport to provide wider and more efficient coverage in the event of a fire emergency. This agreement is similar to other agreements already signed between the VAA and Sidney and Central Saanich.
On Land and Sea
I voted with the Council majority to accept a recommendation from the Agricultural Advisory Commission to refer for preliminary review the draft Agricultural Area Plan to legal counsel who has expertise in agriculture. Cost and timelines were two issues raised by other Council members so we requested CAO, Bruce Williams, to explore approximate costs with the lawyer. The draft plan will have to go to a lawyer for review in any case so this recommendation is in keeping with District policy and process, particularly when the Agricultural Area Plan may have implications for changes to our Official Community Plan and zoning bylaws. Mayor and Council are enthusiastic about the Plan, noting that North Saanich leads the CRD in this important work. Stay tuned...
I voted with Council to approve in principle the creation of a regional Task Force to address the thorny issue of derelict vessels in local waters. This item emerged from the Tri-Municipal Council meeting held a few weeks ago after I added it to that agenda. There is a groundswell of public support across our three communities to do something about this problem which poses an environmental hazard to our local waters, never mind the aesthetics, which are also of concern. The big issues that need to be addressed in my view are environmental protection, coordination between and among local, provincial and federal authorities, costs to communities of clean-up, where to take derelict vessels and finding and fining owners who "dump" and abandon their vessels, to name just a few. Municipalities and regional districts seem willing to tackle the problem and show leadership on the issue, provided questions are first answered about authority, jurisdiction and financial support. My hope is that the Task Force will bring together all necessary parties and provide a forum in which to develop a plan that is both effective and sustainable. Janet Rooke of the Tsehum Harbour Authority shares local concerns and has offered to assist the work of a Task Force should it be established and its mandate and structure clarified.
One point I want to make about this issue -- some suggest that the live-aboard community is responsible for the problem of derelict and abandoned vessels, that live-aboards are the real culprits. This is not my experience and I would argue that the criticism is unfair. My husband and I boated for over 30 years and, at one stage, lived aboard our sailboat in the early 1980's, before our son was born. We were both professionals and commuted to and from Victoria to our jobs. We joined a small community of other live-aboards who were established, respected, had jobs and were an integral part of their community. They cared deeply about protecting the marine environment and were often the first people on the dock and on the sea to help other boaters. They provided to marina owners and other boaters a sense of security against vandalism, break-ins and after hours' emergencies.
I hope that during deliberation on this important issue that we remember that live-aboards comprise a largely responsible group who add to the diversity of our local communities. Live-aboards who are moored at marinas pay a substantial monthly moorage, pay for hydro on the dock and pay for other related amenities. They also contribute to local commerce and business. Please, in our haste to blame others, let's not jump to wrong conclusions. I am reminded of the adage, "Jumping to conclusions makes for rough landings."
If you have questions about this initiative, please feel free to contact Councillors Adam Olsen and Susan Mason from Central Saanich and Mayors Alice Finall and Larry Cross from North Saanich and Sidney. Stay tuned for more information about the Task Force...
More News About Vantreight Development Proposal
A group of concerned North and Central Saanich citizens recently contacted me and asked that I post on this blog site contact information for them and a brief summary about their efforts. They are working to inform citizens about the proposed density housing development slated for the northwest corner of the Vantreight farm in Central Saanich (at the North Saanich/Central Saanich border). This development has been the subject of public controversy, given its potential impacts on adjacent neighbourhoods, the ALR and land use, the CRD Regional Growth Strategy and on local resources and infrastructure such as roads/traffic, water, waste disposal and energy consumption.
My understanding is that Central Saanich Council moved one step closer at their December 14 Council meeting and voted, among other things, to send the proposal to the CRD's Planning Department for its review. This could be significant to the future of the proposal in my view, given that if the development is found to contravene or compromise Central Saanich's Regional Context statement in its Official Community Plan, then the development proposal becomes the centerpiece in a wider discussion and approval process at the CRD Board table, under the provisions of the Regional Growth Strategy's (RGS) amending formula.
You may recall a similar situation in the Highlands about 2 years ago when a controversial application to provide municipal water to Bear Mountain Resort required an amendment because it contravened the Highlands' Official Community Plan's Regional Context Statement, requiring a referral for decision to the CRD Board. The Highlands decision became a galvanizing issue locally and regionally related to the RGS; I understand that to amend the RGS needs unanimous support of the CRD Board. The CRD Board ultimately turned down the Highlands application, the decision was appealed and mediation by the Province was attempted but failed.
North Saanich Mayor and Council have already forwarded a letter to Central Saanich Mayor and Council outlining our concerns about the proposal, given its extremely close proximity to North Saanich Southeast Quadrant neighbourhoods. To date, I understand that in addition to a variety of land use and environmental concerns, a planned road allowance into the development and lack of sufficient buffering could create significant noise and air pollution from traffic gaining access and egress right through Southeast Quadrant neighbourhoods. Naturally, North Saanich will make every effort to mitigate any impacts on its residents.
For more information about the concerned citizens group, please visit their blog site at http://saveourruralland.blogspot.com. For detailed information about the Vantreight development proposal, please visit the Central Saanich website at www.centralsaanich.ca
My understanding is that Central Saanich Council moved one step closer at their December 14 Council meeting and voted, among other things, to send the proposal to the CRD's Planning Department for its review. This could be significant to the future of the proposal in my view, given that if the development is found to contravene or compromise Central Saanich's Regional Context statement in its Official Community Plan, then the development proposal becomes the centerpiece in a wider discussion and approval process at the CRD Board table, under the provisions of the Regional Growth Strategy's (RGS) amending formula.
You may recall a similar situation in the Highlands about 2 years ago when a controversial application to provide municipal water to Bear Mountain Resort required an amendment because it contravened the Highlands' Official Community Plan's Regional Context Statement, requiring a referral for decision to the CRD Board. The Highlands decision became a galvanizing issue locally and regionally related to the RGS; I understand that to amend the RGS needs unanimous support of the CRD Board. The CRD Board ultimately turned down the Highlands application, the decision was appealed and mediation by the Province was attempted but failed.
North Saanich Mayor and Council have already forwarded a letter to Central Saanich Mayor and Council outlining our concerns about the proposal, given its extremely close proximity to North Saanich Southeast Quadrant neighbourhoods. To date, I understand that in addition to a variety of land use and environmental concerns, a planned road allowance into the development and lack of sufficient buffering could create significant noise and air pollution from traffic gaining access and egress right through Southeast Quadrant neighbourhoods. Naturally, North Saanich will make every effort to mitigate any impacts on its residents.
For more information about the concerned citizens group, please visit their blog site at http://saveourruralland.blogspot.com. For detailed information about the Vantreight development proposal, please visit the Central Saanich website at www.centralsaanich.ca
Mayor Finall's Annual Message to NS Residents
Mayor Alice Finall recently published her annual message to North Saanich residents and asked that I also post it on my blog site for your information:
Council has reached the end of its first year in office. While this is the Mayor’s report, I want to make it clear from the outset that what has been achieved this year is the result of the hard work of Council. I wish to take this opportunity of thanking Council members for their support, talents and contributions during our first year.
In reflecting, I believe it is important to review the basis upon which I sought election and similarly, the election foundation for the majority of Council. Many residents will be aware of the lengthy Official Community Plan (OCP) review, which finished in May, 2007 with adoption of our present OCP. Many will also be aware of the efforts made to pursue a philosophical shift in the future of our municipality by some members of previous councils during that review. The strength of the visions in our present OCP is directly attributable to the concerted efforts of our residents and the majority of our present Council.
I believe that the basis for my strong showing in the last election is my dedication to the philosophy of our OCP and the continued desire of the majority of our Council and our residents to embrace that philosophy. The leadership I have brought to Council has been proactive, sensibly grounded in forward looking policies and continuously working toward collaborative resolution to divisions of opinion.
Much of the work done by Council over the past year has focused on internal governance of the municipality.
With that focus I have:
Directed a complete review and update of all municipal policies and procedures, to ensure fairness, consistency and relevance
Completed changes to Council meeting procedures to simplify and improve
Opportunities for public participation, and restore the working role of Committee of the Whole.
With Council and staff inspiration and assistance, revamped the District Newsletter, making it available to every household by mail
With Council support, continued to explore new options for enhanced communication with the public; for example, utilizing internet technology through out District website and email
Restored quarterly neighbourhood meetings for informal communication with municipal residents
Hosted, with Council, a volunteer recognition event at Municipal Hall.
In spite of the time spent on these initiatives, Council has not become immersed in minutiae. We have spent considerable time addressing initiatives begun by the previous Council, and those required by legislation, concentrating efforts on ensuring adherence to the OCP and our role in the Regional Growth Strategy while doing so.
These include:
Review and update of the Council Strategic Plan, with new priorities reflecting Mayor and Council’s community vision
Approving a pilot plan for secondary suites
Beginning meetings to consider the implementation of the Marine Task Force recommendations, to be completed in the early new year
Launched the North Saanich Agricultural Area Plan public consultation process with the report to Council expected in early 2010
Completed a contract with BC Ferries for sewer connection
I have been responsive to events over which Council had no direct control, making continued efforts to keep our community needs in the forefront and communicating with all involved parties in a proactive way. These events will continue to have a large impact on our local community. I have:
Called meetings with Victoria Airport Authority, provincial representatives and Sidney Council to address design and community issues for proposed McTavish Interchange, as soon as Council became aware of the application by the Victoria Airport Authority
At Council’s initiative implemented a resolution to create a McTavish Road Interchange Committee to deal with community needs and concerns related to the project
Addressed closure of Dunsmuir Lodge by calling for a public meeting with the University of Victoria and for public disclosure on future plans for the property. A report on this matter will come to Council within the next few weeks.
I have worked cooperatively with neighbouring communities:
Taking an active role in tri-municipal initiatives, establishing new working relationships with Mayors of Sidney and Central Saanich
Proactively pursuing a new Relationship Agreement with Pauquachin First Nation, with full Council support
Continuing the Tseycum Relationship Agreement begun by the last Council.
We are moving forward with concerns of the present Council:
To improve the prospects of local farming, recognizing its importance to the community economically and socially, and completing implementation of the Agricultural Area Plan
Working with staff in budget deliberations toward increased efficiencies
A thorough review and update of the municipal bylaws to ensure the effectiveness and relevance of District legislation.
In addition to the interests of our immediate community, I recognize the need for North Saanich to take a strong role in regional matters. The Capital Regional District exercises significant and wide ranging regional responsibilities on behalf of all the region’s municipalities.
To that end, I have taken the CRD Director’s role for North Saanich. I have served as Chair of CRD Environment Committee, am a member of the Mayors’ Coalition on Homelessness, member of CRD Service Delivery Review committee, a member of CRD Millstream Remediation Cost Apportionment Sub-Committee, a member of CRD Planning and Transportation Committee, a member of CRD Finance and Protective Services Committee and am working to establish a CRD septic bylaw sub-committee. The CRD is in the midst of review of the Regional Growth Strategy, affecting every municipality in the region.
After this initial year, I remain convinced that strong leadership and forward planning, both for land use and fiscal stability, are essential to the health and balance of this community. I am grateful to my Council colleagues and our excellent municipal staff who have worked so hard this past year to support me. With this level of support, I am able as Mayor to continue my efforts, on behalf of this Council and my community, to achieve our goals."
Council has reached the end of its first year in office. While this is the Mayor’s report, I want to make it clear from the outset that what has been achieved this year is the result of the hard work of Council. I wish to take this opportunity of thanking Council members for their support, talents and contributions during our first year.
In reflecting, I believe it is important to review the basis upon which I sought election and similarly, the election foundation for the majority of Council. Many residents will be aware of the lengthy Official Community Plan (OCP) review, which finished in May, 2007 with adoption of our present OCP. Many will also be aware of the efforts made to pursue a philosophical shift in the future of our municipality by some members of previous councils during that review. The strength of the visions in our present OCP is directly attributable to the concerted efforts of our residents and the majority of our present Council.
I believe that the basis for my strong showing in the last election is my dedication to the philosophy of our OCP and the continued desire of the majority of our Council and our residents to embrace that philosophy. The leadership I have brought to Council has been proactive, sensibly grounded in forward looking policies and continuously working toward collaborative resolution to divisions of opinion.
Much of the work done by Council over the past year has focused on internal governance of the municipality.
With that focus I have:
Directed a complete review and update of all municipal policies and procedures, to ensure fairness, consistency and relevance
Completed changes to Council meeting procedures to simplify and improve
Opportunities for public participation, and restore the working role of Committee of the Whole.
With Council and staff inspiration and assistance, revamped the District Newsletter, making it available to every household by mail
With Council support, continued to explore new options for enhanced communication with the public; for example, utilizing internet technology through out District website and email
Restored quarterly neighbourhood meetings for informal communication with municipal residents
Hosted, with Council, a volunteer recognition event at Municipal Hall.
In spite of the time spent on these initiatives, Council has not become immersed in minutiae. We have spent considerable time addressing initiatives begun by the previous Council, and those required by legislation, concentrating efforts on ensuring adherence to the OCP and our role in the Regional Growth Strategy while doing so.
These include:
Review and update of the Council Strategic Plan, with new priorities reflecting Mayor and Council’s community vision
Approving a pilot plan for secondary suites
Beginning meetings to consider the implementation of the Marine Task Force recommendations, to be completed in the early new year
Launched the North Saanich Agricultural Area Plan public consultation process with the report to Council expected in early 2010
Completed a contract with BC Ferries for sewer connection
I have been responsive to events over which Council had no direct control, making continued efforts to keep our community needs in the forefront and communicating with all involved parties in a proactive way. These events will continue to have a large impact on our local community. I have:
Called meetings with Victoria Airport Authority, provincial representatives and Sidney Council to address design and community issues for proposed McTavish Interchange, as soon as Council became aware of the application by the Victoria Airport Authority
At Council’s initiative implemented a resolution to create a McTavish Road Interchange Committee to deal with community needs and concerns related to the project
Addressed closure of Dunsmuir Lodge by calling for a public meeting with the University of Victoria and for public disclosure on future plans for the property. A report on this matter will come to Council within the next few weeks.
I have worked cooperatively with neighbouring communities:
Taking an active role in tri-municipal initiatives, establishing new working relationships with Mayors of Sidney and Central Saanich
Proactively pursuing a new Relationship Agreement with Pauquachin First Nation, with full Council support
Continuing the Tseycum Relationship Agreement begun by the last Council.
We are moving forward with concerns of the present Council:
To improve the prospects of local farming, recognizing its importance to the community economically and socially, and completing implementation of the Agricultural Area Plan
Working with staff in budget deliberations toward increased efficiencies
A thorough review and update of the municipal bylaws to ensure the effectiveness and relevance of District legislation.
In addition to the interests of our immediate community, I recognize the need for North Saanich to take a strong role in regional matters. The Capital Regional District exercises significant and wide ranging regional responsibilities on behalf of all the region’s municipalities.
To that end, I have taken the CRD Director’s role for North Saanich. I have served as Chair of CRD Environment Committee, am a member of the Mayors’ Coalition on Homelessness, member of CRD Service Delivery Review committee, a member of CRD Millstream Remediation Cost Apportionment Sub-Committee, a member of CRD Planning and Transportation Committee, a member of CRD Finance and Protective Services Committee and am working to establish a CRD septic bylaw sub-committee. The CRD is in the midst of review of the Regional Growth Strategy, affecting every municipality in the region.
After this initial year, I remain convinced that strong leadership and forward planning, both for land use and fiscal stability, are essential to the health and balance of this community. I am grateful to my Council colleagues and our excellent municipal staff who have worked so hard this past year to support me. With this level of support, I am able as Mayor to continue my efforts, on behalf of this Council and my community, to achieve our goals."
Festive Winter Lunch Beets The Cold
Hosted on December 12 by Diana Chown, with help in the kitchen from Susan Chandler, Penny Gibbs, Janet Silman and Sommelier and wine educator Kami Lee Robb, I attended the North Saanich Food for the Future Society luncheon fundraiser that for "foodies," was simply to die for, a seasonal winter lunch menu conceived and prepared by local chef extraordinaire and organic grower Tina Baynes. If good food and good company weren't enough, local sommelier and wine expert Kami Lee Robb poured the complementary wine to boost each course.
Made from regional and seasonal winter fare, lunch opened with appetizers beet and radish salsa and a quince cheese membrillo. These dishes were followed by a beet and goat cheese salad and fresh winter squash served raw with marinade. We moved on to a basic pasta with arugula pesto and fresh walnuts, accompanied by sautéed squash with sage. Dessert was poached pear in red wine, with Italian shortbread seasoned with rosemary, parmesan and chili. Organic Ometepe dark roast coffee and Sea Cider Mint and Nettle Tea gently washed down dessert.
What made this event significant is that all of the ingredients used, including a selection of wines and cider, were from Vancouver Island and Salt Spring Island merchants and growers, including:
What I love about this Society is the focus on regional and local food production that underscores not only the availability of food close to home but also the ability of our local growers to harvest and market food that is organic, healthy and safe -- the point about local food production and the need to support it is that you know where it comes from and who grows it.
If you are interested in supporting the North Saanich Food for the Future Society or would like more information about "growing local," please contact Diana Chown at 656-9633.
Don't Forget! The Society also supports a local Winter Market at St. John's Church on West Saanich Road (behind the church in the portable), held the second Saturday of the months of February, March, April and May 2010 from 9:30 to 12:00 noon. You can get the produce mentioned above plus seeds, lamb, knitted things, jams and jellies, seedlings and more.
Come On, Let's All Grow Local!
Made from regional and seasonal winter fare, lunch opened with appetizers beet and radish salsa and a quince cheese membrillo. These dishes were followed by a beet and goat cheese salad and fresh winter squash served raw with marinade. We moved on to a basic pasta with arugula pesto and fresh walnuts, accompanied by sautéed squash with sage. Dessert was poached pear in red wine, with Italian shortbread seasoned with rosemary, parmesan and chili. Organic Ometepe dark roast coffee and Sea Cider Mint and Nettle Tea gently washed down dessert.
What made this event significant is that all of the ingredients used, including a selection of wines and cider, were from Vancouver Island and Salt Spring Island merchants and growers, including:
- ALM Organic Farm - Otter Point Road, Sooke
- Bailiwick Farm - McTavish Road, North Saanich
- Corner Farm - Towner Park Road, North Saanich
- Deep Cove Market - West Saanich Road
- Heather's Garden - Downey Road
- Little Qualicum Cheeseworks
- Salt Spring Island Cheese
- Smyth's Market Garden - Downey Road
- The Muse Chalet Winery - North Saanich
- Sea Cider Cidery - Central Saanich
What I love about this Society is the focus on regional and local food production that underscores not only the availability of food close to home but also the ability of our local growers to harvest and market food that is organic, healthy and safe -- the point about local food production and the need to support it is that you know where it comes from and who grows it.
If you are interested in supporting the North Saanich Food for the Future Society or would like more information about "growing local," please contact Diana Chown at 656-9633.
Don't Forget! The Society also supports a local Winter Market at St. John's Church on West Saanich Road (behind the church in the portable), held the second Saturday of the months of February, March, April and May 2010 from 9:30 to 12:00 noon. You can get the produce mentioned above plus seeds, lamb, knitted things, jams and jellies, seedlings and more.
Come On, Let's All Grow Local!
Go West To Find Best Municipal Accountability
In a recent article written for the Vancouver Sun, David Seymour, Senior Policy Analyst at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy and author of the Local Government Performance Index in 2009 (www.fcpp.org) suggests that if you are looking for the highest local government accountability it appears to be in the western Provinces of Alberta and British Columbia. He states that "in my review of 75 municipalities across Canada, 6 out of the top 10 were from British Columbia (the rest were from Alberta)."
He points out that accountability and transparency are important principles for local governments, especially when you consider that municipalities are economically significant in Canada. Seymour writes that "taken together, Canada's municipalities represent a roughly $65 billion-per-year industry, or about $1 of every $20 in GDP. He goes on to cite that "at 5 per cent of GDP, a 20 per cent increase in the productivity of municipal government would add a full percentage point to the national wealth."
It also appears that from his observations and research, Seymour concludes that "perhaps the biggest difference between BC municipalities and others...is the quality of reporting that citizens can expect when it comes to finance and service performance...When it comes to questions of providing disclosure on the value of capital assets, whether those values are depreciated according to best practice asset management, definitions are given for the line items that money is spent on or those expenditure areas are associated with measured performance compared to numerical targets, municipal reporting is the best in the West."
He goes on to say that, as with other governments, municipal government is a "natural monopoly" since it is the single source of services. He suggests that "consumers, the people who pay taxes and user fees and use roads, garbage collection and recreational services, don't have the same level of choice in who provides these essential services as they would in a competitive market." Therefore, operating in this context makes it even more of an imperative, Seymour argues, for municipalities to "help residents understand what services are being provided and at what cost, with numerical performance targets and actual performance achievements that are linked to areas of expenditure."
I encourage you to visit the website noted above for more information and detail about the Seymour report.
He points out that accountability and transparency are important principles for local governments, especially when you consider that municipalities are economically significant in Canada. Seymour writes that "taken together, Canada's municipalities represent a roughly $65 billion-per-year industry, or about $1 of every $20 in GDP. He goes on to cite that "at 5 per cent of GDP, a 20 per cent increase in the productivity of municipal government would add a full percentage point to the national wealth."
It also appears that from his observations and research, Seymour concludes that "perhaps the biggest difference between BC municipalities and others...is the quality of reporting that citizens can expect when it comes to finance and service performance...When it comes to questions of providing disclosure on the value of capital assets, whether those values are depreciated according to best practice asset management, definitions are given for the line items that money is spent on or those expenditure areas are associated with measured performance compared to numerical targets, municipal reporting is the best in the West."
He goes on to say that, as with other governments, municipal government is a "natural monopoly" since it is the single source of services. He suggests that "consumers, the people who pay taxes and user fees and use roads, garbage collection and recreational services, don't have the same level of choice in who provides these essential services as they would in a competitive market." Therefore, operating in this context makes it even more of an imperative, Seymour argues, for municipalities to "help residents understand what services are being provided and at what cost, with numerical performance targets and actual performance achievements that are linked to areas of expenditure."
I encourage you to visit the website noted above for more information and detail about the Seymour report.
Over the Fence
Thanks to all the residents who attended the last Neighbourhood Meeting of the year. I was happy to see a strong turn out and nearly all seats filled on December 2 when local residents from the Pauquachin/Ardmore area met informally with Mayor and Council at the Ardmore Golf Course clubhouse.
The meeting opened with questions about activity on waterfront lots related to tree-cutting and retaining/sea walls and moved to concerns/comments about walking trails, parks and fire safety, including a request for a water line and fire hydrants to the North Saanich section of Alec Road. General topics raised by residents that I heard included:
New draft tree by-law and issues and concerns it creates related to tree-cutting, pruning and species protection, especially for view properties (how viable and realistic is the current draft?)
I suggested that we may have to "go back to the drawing board" on this draft, given that it has been in the works for about 10 years and remains controversial, despite a history of community consultation. Mayor and Council members assured residents that no new bylaw will be adopted anytime soon, given recent feedback/concerns of many residents.
Retaining walls and seawalls for waterfront properties facing erosion (are owners prevented from building these structures?)
I assured one resident who raised this question that during my tenure on Council and as a former member of and Council Liaison to the District's Environmental Advisory Commission, sea walls have been consistently approved. A boulder stack design seems preferred because it appears to have the least environmental impact on foreshore/marine habitats. We also have strong local private/public sector expertise, including our own Environmental Advisory Commission, to advise property owners on this issue.
Need for more cycle lanes, especially on West Saanich Road south (what are the plans to add new cycle lanes?)
Mayor and Council members pointed out that new cycle lanes have been added to East Saanich Road, to West Saanich Road north, to Wain Road and on airport lands, as a reflection of their high priority for the municipality and for the public. They are costly but because of the efforts of Public Works staff related to grants, partnerships and cost-savings/reserves, North Saanich will continue to expand its network of cycle lanes. Expanding lanes along West Saanich Road south, past Pauquachin Village, would require consultation with federal and provincial authorities as well as with Pauquachin Council.
North Saanich trail network enviable but there needs to be new measures related to fire and smoking on trails.
We agree that signage and monitoring during the fire hazard season is critical to ongoing public/community safety. Brian Robinson, Supt. of Public Works and his staff do an excellent job of providing oversight to the safety of trails, beach accesses and local parks throughout North Saanich.
Dog owners need further reminder/education about picking up after their pet (signage, bag dispensers?)
We agreed, however, I believe that the majority of dog owners in North Saanich are responsible and it is hoped that such incidents are isolated.
Open ditches and silt run-off; jeopardizes fish habitat (when will North Saanich have a master drainage plan?)
While I understand there is currently no master drainage plan for North Saanich, the Infrastructure Services Department continues to address issues and make improvements, the latest being along McDonald Park Road east and west. There appears to be many factors that affect drainage and impacts on habitats and North Saanich continues to work together with the CRD to monitor and correct problems.
The Marine Task Force Report and proposed marina industry expansion (are we considering adding 10% capacity to existing local marina boat moorage?)
Mayor and Council members explained that no decisions have been made about marina expansion. We will be exploring options for a boat launch on the West side of the Peninsula and consulting with the local marina industry focused on increased capacity without increased footprint e.g., dry land boat storage. I am hoping that we can find solutions that enable us to protect the environment while also meeting the needs of the local boating community.
For an official copy of the minutes of this meeting, please visit the District of North Saanich website in the next few days. If you have any questions or comments on the above-noted account of the meeting, please get in touch with me directly.
Note: Neighbourhood Meetings will continue next year so please check this blog and the District website for the 2010 schedule.
The meeting opened with questions about activity on waterfront lots related to tree-cutting and retaining/sea walls and moved to concerns/comments about walking trails, parks and fire safety, including a request for a water line and fire hydrants to the North Saanich section of Alec Road. General topics raised by residents that I heard included:
New draft tree by-law and issues and concerns it creates related to tree-cutting, pruning and species protection, especially for view properties (how viable and realistic is the current draft?)
I suggested that we may have to "go back to the drawing board" on this draft, given that it has been in the works for about 10 years and remains controversial, despite a history of community consultation. Mayor and Council members assured residents that no new bylaw will be adopted anytime soon, given recent feedback/concerns of many residents.
Retaining walls and seawalls for waterfront properties facing erosion (are owners prevented from building these structures?)
I assured one resident who raised this question that during my tenure on Council and as a former member of and Council Liaison to the District's Environmental Advisory Commission, sea walls have been consistently approved. A boulder stack design seems preferred because it appears to have the least environmental impact on foreshore/marine habitats. We also have strong local private/public sector expertise, including our own Environmental Advisory Commission, to advise property owners on this issue.
Need for more cycle lanes, especially on West Saanich Road south (what are the plans to add new cycle lanes?)
Mayor and Council members pointed out that new cycle lanes have been added to East Saanich Road, to West Saanich Road north, to Wain Road and on airport lands, as a reflection of their high priority for the municipality and for the public. They are costly but because of the efforts of Public Works staff related to grants, partnerships and cost-savings/reserves, North Saanich will continue to expand its network of cycle lanes. Expanding lanes along West Saanich Road south, past Pauquachin Village, would require consultation with federal and provincial authorities as well as with Pauquachin Council.
North Saanich trail network enviable but there needs to be new measures related to fire and smoking on trails.
We agree that signage and monitoring during the fire hazard season is critical to ongoing public/community safety. Brian Robinson, Supt. of Public Works and his staff do an excellent job of providing oversight to the safety of trails, beach accesses and local parks throughout North Saanich.
Dog owners need further reminder/education about picking up after their pet (signage, bag dispensers?)
We agreed, however, I believe that the majority of dog owners in North Saanich are responsible and it is hoped that such incidents are isolated.
Open ditches and silt run-off; jeopardizes fish habitat (when will North Saanich have a master drainage plan?)
While I understand there is currently no master drainage plan for North Saanich, the Infrastructure Services Department continues to address issues and make improvements, the latest being along McDonald Park Road east and west. There appears to be many factors that affect drainage and impacts on habitats and North Saanich continues to work together with the CRD to monitor and correct problems.
The Marine Task Force Report and proposed marina industry expansion (are we considering adding 10% capacity to existing local marina boat moorage?)
Mayor and Council members explained that no decisions have been made about marina expansion. We will be exploring options for a boat launch on the West side of the Peninsula and consulting with the local marina industry focused on increased capacity without increased footprint e.g., dry land boat storage. I am hoping that we can find solutions that enable us to protect the environment while also meeting the needs of the local boating community.
For an official copy of the minutes of this meeting, please visit the District of North Saanich website in the next few days. If you have any questions or comments on the above-noted account of the meeting, please get in touch with me directly.
Note: Neighbourhood Meetings will continue next year so please check this blog and the District website for the 2010 schedule.
What Do Canadians Value?
Royal Roads University recently announced the results of its Canadian National Values Assessment, conducted by the Todd Thomas Institute for Values-Based Leadership. The survey of 1,251 Canadians reveals "a widely shared set of personal values that emphasize relationships and qualities that contribute to social cohesion, such as honesty, family, and caring." Marilyn Taylor, PhD and Director of the Institute, goes on to say that survey results "also show a high level of agreement among Canadians that our culture is being compromised by a serious level of dysfunction in the form of social risks, economic vulnerability and institutional ineffectiveness."
Other indicators of dysfunction were "bureaucracy, unemployment, crime/violence, wasted resources, corruption, and uncertainty about the future." These results cut across gender, age, regions, public and private sectors and ethnicity. The survey also suggests that respondents are calling for a reduction of bureaucracy, better government accountability and a stronger social safety net. Asked to choose "ten values that they would like to see reflected in Canadian society, the highest responses went to accountability, caring for the elderly, affordable housing, effective health care, caring for the disadvantaged, concern for future generations, poverty reduction, employment opportunities, human rights and governmental effectiveness."
It wasn't all negative however; human rights, freedom of speech, law enforcement and quality of life were identified as significant strengths of our current national culture.
"The results of this assessment will be widely distributed so Canadian individuals, organizations and governments can use this information to help realize our desired future for Canada," said Taylor. It seems that values-based leadership is the mark of a new way of moving all of us toward a kinder, more effective and more responsible social system, one that truly serves Canadians no matter who they are or where they live, work or gather.
The Institute is also planning to facilitate public dialogue, provide subsequent national values assessments and support ongoing applied research on values and their relationship to communities and organizations. For more information about the survey and the Todd Thomas Institute for Values-Based Leadership, please visit (www.royalroads.ca/tti)
Other indicators of dysfunction were "bureaucracy, unemployment, crime/violence, wasted resources, corruption, and uncertainty about the future." These results cut across gender, age, regions, public and private sectors and ethnicity. The survey also suggests that respondents are calling for a reduction of bureaucracy, better government accountability and a stronger social safety net. Asked to choose "ten values that they would like to see reflected in Canadian society, the highest responses went to accountability, caring for the elderly, affordable housing, effective health care, caring for the disadvantaged, concern for future generations, poverty reduction, employment opportunities, human rights and governmental effectiveness."
It wasn't all negative however; human rights, freedom of speech, law enforcement and quality of life were identified as significant strengths of our current national culture.
"The results of this assessment will be widely distributed so Canadian individuals, organizations and governments can use this information to help realize our desired future for Canada," said Taylor. It seems that values-based leadership is the mark of a new way of moving all of us toward a kinder, more effective and more responsible social system, one that truly serves Canadians no matter who they are or where they live, work or gather.
The Institute is also planning to facilitate public dialogue, provide subsequent national values assessments and support ongoing applied research on values and their relationship to communities and organizations. For more information about the survey and the Todd Thomas Institute for Values-Based Leadership, please visit (www.royalroads.ca/tti)
Affordable Housing as National Policy
I wanted to express my gratitude to Mayor Alice Finall who fulfilled my request and, on behalf of North Saanich Council, sent this week to the Federal Government a letter urging Parliament to support a private member's bill, Bill C-304, calling for a national affordable housing strategy.
Victoria City Councilor Charlayne Thornton-Joe, who Chairs the CRD's Regional Housing Corporation Board (of which I am a member) is leading the charge and canvassing member municipalities, Chambers of Commerce, public and private sector organizations and others to write Federal leaders and MPs with letters of support for this Bill, which will be voted on sometime after December 8, 2009. I understand that it has already passed first and second readings and only needs a third and final reading to be adopted.
For more information about Bill C-304, please visit publications@pwgsc.gc.ca or http://publications.gc.ca
If you are interested in supporting Bill C-304, please send a letter to that effect to MP Dean Allison, Chair of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and Status of Persons with Disabilities (HUMA), as follows:
Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Person with Disabilities (HUMA)
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON
K1A 0A6
Victoria City Councilor Charlayne Thornton-Joe, who Chairs the CRD's Regional Housing Corporation Board (of which I am a member) is leading the charge and canvassing member municipalities, Chambers of Commerce, public and private sector organizations and others to write Federal leaders and MPs with letters of support for this Bill, which will be voted on sometime after December 8, 2009. I understand that it has already passed first and second readings and only needs a third and final reading to be adopted.
For more information about Bill C-304, please visit publications@pwgsc.gc.ca or http://publications.gc.ca
If you are interested in supporting Bill C-304, please send a letter to that effect to MP Dean Allison, Chair of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and Status of Persons with Disabilities (HUMA), as follows:
Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Person with Disabilities (HUMA)
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON
K1A 0A6
Where Do We Grow From Here?
In the next few months, a review of the Capital Regional District's (CRD) Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) will be well underway and was, in part, the genesis behind the November 14th CRD-sponsored Forum of Councils' "Sustainable Futures" workshop, focused on sustainability, a much-used term but not always well defined. Planners, municipal staff, politicians and CRD staff joined the speakers for a morning that examined sustainability and planning in a largely urban context.
To help us understand what sustainability is and what it means to population growth, climate change, community planning and our future, keynote speakers at the workshop were Mike Harcourt (former municipal Councilor, Vancouver Mayor and BC Premier and now leader and spokesperson on sustainable urban growth and planning) and Dave Biggs, founder of Metro Quest (researcher and leading consultant on public involvement in urban planning and sustainability whose company has developed interactive tools for public engagement).
Highlights from Mike Harcourt:
Calling this the "urban century," Mike Harcourt asked, "How do we try to define the concept of "sustainability?" He suggests that there are 4 key elements:
To help us understand what sustainability is and what it means to population growth, climate change, community planning and our future, keynote speakers at the workshop were Mike Harcourt (former municipal Councilor, Vancouver Mayor and BC Premier and now leader and spokesperson on sustainable urban growth and planning) and Dave Biggs, founder of Metro Quest (researcher and leading consultant on public involvement in urban planning and sustainability whose company has developed interactive tools for public engagement).
Highlights from Mike Harcourt:
Calling this the "urban century," Mike Harcourt asked, "How do we try to define the concept of "sustainability?" He suggests that there are 4 key elements:
- environmental health
- social inclusion/justice
- vibrant culture (sense of "place," creativity and innovation)
He argues that at the rate the world is going, we have no choice but to plan sustainable communities -- if we make the wrong choices, there will be consequences.
He tells us that human growth patterns suggest that by 2050, there will be 10 billion people inhabiting our earth (the equivalent of adding two more Chinas) and 75% of these will be living in cities. To put this into some perspective, Harcourt stated that in 1930 the world population was 2 billion and in 2000, it was 6 billion. He cites
Harcourt also warns that approximately 1 billion people in developing countries could be living in shanty towns by 2050. Regarding population impacts on climate, Harcourt says that in
His message to all of us is "get with it" -- we can no longer afford the kind of suburban sprawl that dominates many of our community landscapes -- we must concentrate growth within urban areas that are already high-density and can be sustained.
He also talks about "live-ability accords" and "sustainability agreements" made between communities that set out principles, standards and values that focus planning on sustainable land use and community development that uses energy integration to reduce air pollution, waste and emissions. He refers to models of mixed use and high density communities that use geo-thermal, solar and waste recovery to heat space and water, not electricity.
He concludes by lauding
- Three books by Richard Florida titled "Rise of the Creative Class," "Flight of the Creative Class" and "Who Is Your City?"
- "The Climate Cover-Up," a book that explores and exposes those who deny that climate change is occurring with major negative impacts on human health and the world's future.
Highlights from Dave Biggs:
Dave Biggs, founder of MetroQuest, opened with some significant facts about our Capital Region:
- By 2038, an additional 110,000 people will live here.
- Of these, 75,000 will be seniors or about 29%, up from the current 17% ratio.
- Currently, 49% of Greater Victoria's population lives in single family dwellings.
- 72% of us drive alone in vehicles.
- Only 12% of us use public transit (if access to public transit is located more than 500 meters away, it is less likely to be used).
We then participated in MetroQuest's interactive process using electronics to collect and tally our responses to questions about what we value for future regional planning and sustainability. As a result, the audience identified 5 top priorities ranked as follows:
- Clean Air
- Lower Carbon Emissions
- Walkable Neighbourhoods
- Vibrant Downtown
- Smaller Eco-Footprint
Audience results further suggest that examples of our lower planning priorities for the future are big homes and big yards, easy car travel and lower fees/taxes. It appears from the results that we also want to concentrate new growth in existing areas such as the Western Communities,
Biggs concluded with some housing projections for the CRD that suggest that by 2046, regional populations will be living in small houses on small lots, in ground level housing (e.g., town homes with access to outside space that is either a small garden or patio) and in condos and apts. in buildings of 5 storeys or less. He also argues that because municipalities have to fund their infrastructure, large developments can be net negative over time, especially after 20 years i.e., servicing costs for these large developments become a significant financial drain for municipalities.
It would seem that Smaller is Better.
SUMMARY:
This workshop was one of the best I have attended in recent years and kudos to the CRD for putting this one on. While the focus was largely on urban development and planning, the information and attitude trends suggest to me that many of us in the Capital Region value the principles expressed in the Regional Growth Strategy -- many municipalities care about and are committed to a sustainable future. Mike Harcourt says we have no choice and Dave Biggs says he can help us to engage our communities in this important conversation.
I realize that those of us who attended this workshop may also be the converted -- I sometimes find that the people who should be in the room are often not so I look forward to making efforts to reach the dissenters, those who have not yet accepted the inevitability of climate change and the need to build sustainable communities.
I also recognize that not everyone in the Capital Region agrees with RGS principles, amending formula or other administrative practices. Some municipalities seem to feel that it impinges on their independence and authority. Mike Harcourt suggests that we should set aside our regional differences for the sake of future sustainability. Others at this workshop are calling for an even stronger RGS document, one that has "some teeth" and will protect against sprawl and safeguard rural, agricultural and green spaces throughout the area, especially on the
Still others suggest different remedies, such as amalgamation as an answer to containing sprawl. But there appears to be divided opinion on amalgamation, with one urban Mayor warning against it, suggesting that it is not a more efficient and cheaper means of delivering local government services, as some proponents would argue. He said in part "...homogenization simply doesn't work for me." In my view he makes a good point.
I attended this workshop with my colleague Councilor Ruby Commandeur who is a local organic farmer in Deep Cove. Both of us specifically asked the speakers about how a rural-residential area such as
While our question went largely unanswered, Tracy Corbett, CRD Senior Manager of Regional Planning, said that she appreciated our questions and comments and offered to explore putting on a session that focuses on small community issues such as rural protection. Like many other local and regional politicians, I believe that if the region values the
The RGS review will be a major CRD undertaking over the next few months and I believe that the results will have far-reaching implications for all of us, especially for communities such as
I have always supported the RGS as a key planning document that demonstrates leadership and innovation in regional planning. Below this post is an article that I wrote last year (Oct. 2008) about the RGS and its importance in protecting small rural communities from urban sprawl and environmental degradation. For those of you who have not read it, I encourage you to do so and for those of you who have, please take the time to read it again.
Please also visit the CRD website to find out more about the RGS review, regional sustainability and information about CRD Board and Committee meetings, at www.crd.bc.ca
Regional Growth Strategy -- Re-Post
I support the motion to deny the amendment to the Regional Growth Strategy. To explain my position, I want to provide the following background information. Like many people, I needed to completely understand what the strategy is and what it really means for North Saanich, the
The Capital Regional District Board adopted the Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) on August 13, 2003. The strategy represents an agreement, developed and approved, by all member municipalities and the regional district in partnership, on social, economic and environmental goals and priority actions.
This is a landmark agreement, a landmark agreement as cited in a report prepared in March 2003 by the Department of Environment and Resource Studies,
- In many urban and rural areas, local citizens motivated by concerns about community disruption and environmental degradation have resisted development projects of various kinds. In some cases, these actions have reflected a broader concern that on a finite planet, or at least in a finite community or region, future growth in human demands will be increasingly destructive.
- The result has been a second wave of growth management that is expected to cover not just all factors that affect growth patterns, but also all consideration that affect long-term community and ecological sustainability.
- Sustainability is fundamentally a matter of applied ethics. It has a human focus but involves consideration of future as well as present interests and recognizes ultimate human dependence on the biosphere. Arguably, commitment to sustainability entails adoption of what Aldo Leopold called the “land ethic” – extending the definition of community from the social interaction of individuals to the linking of all components of the natural world, and requiring people to view themselves as stewards of the land.
- Development of this kind allows for the building of a shared local culture that encompasses history, values and traditions of a particular place or region.
In 1995, the BC government passed the Growth Strategies Statutes Amendment Act to facilitate better coordination of municipalities, regional districts and the provincial government to deal with complex growth management issues. However, its most significant provisions focus on the regional level. The act gave “legislative authority” for regional districts to voluntarily develop and adopt a Regional Growth Strategy.
A regional growth strategy is a regional vision that commits affected municipalities and regional districts to a course of action to meet common social, economic and environmental objectives. It also forms a part of a municipality’s Official Community Plan through a Regional Context Statement, which links the RGS to the municipal plan. The RGS is designed to outline the regional vision for the next 20 years.
The core objective of the Growth Strategies Act is “to promote human settlement that is socially, economically and environmentally healthy and makes efficient use of ... land and other resources.” The foremost priority goals for the RGS are:
- Avoiding urban sprawl and ensuring that development takes place where adequate facilities exist…
- Protecting environmentally sensitive areas.
- Maintaining the integrity of a secure, productive resource base, including agricultural, and forestland reserves.
- Protecting the quality and quantity of ground and surface water.
Conclusion:
Without consistent support and long term commitment from the Capital Regional District through its Regional Growth Strategy, municipal boundaries that keep urban containment compact will be vulnerable, resulting in unmanaged growth that will continue to threaten green and rural spaces, agriculture and farmland and forests and water resources. Local governments in the Capital Regional District must now decide how strong, consistent and effective they will be in the application of sound land use policy that considers critical factors such as:
- Regional energy planning and conservation
- Food production and security
- Efficient, economical and environmentally sound transportation planning
- Conservation and use of water resources
- Waste disposal
The Regional Growth Strategy enables local governments to manage growth with confidence and vision, to plan for the future and for an environmental legacy of which generations after us can be proud.
The report by the
If the necessary goodwill and commitment are to be found anywhere in British Columbia, they are to be found among the municipal leaders and residents of the Capital Regional District, given the long standing concern for quality of life issues in this region. What happens in the CRD will therefore be an important test of the Regional Growth Strategy mechanism. If effective growth management using the Regional Growth Strategy cannot be accomplished in the Capital Regional District, it is unlikely that the mechanism will work well anywhere in the Province.
Municipal Spending a Concern
I read with interest on November 6, 2009 the Times-Colonist article by reporter Bill Cleverley that suggests that municipalities spend too much, based on a recent study released by the Canadian Federation of Independent Business. Based on data collected between 2000 and 2007, North Saanich's "fiscal sustainability gap" was quoted at 2.98.
Results for other CRD municipalities varied between a low of 1.71 to a high of 8.62. Questions were raised in the article by some local Mayors about the validity and context of the data, given consistent provincial downloading to municipal governments during the past 8 or 9 years. It was argued that downloading programs and services negatively impacts local government's ability to meet and sustain demands, such as increased police services. Another factor is salaries paid to municipal staff that apparently average 35% higher than the private sector.
Financial issues and municipal spending are ongoing concerns of mine, especially for a municipality the size of North Saanich. Large infrastructure projects such as the new sewer system for Deep Cove/Pat Bay and McDonald Park Road was about a $15M bill that frankly should not have been imposed on taxpayers at a time when construction costs were at their highest and the real estate boom was at its peak. This capital cost, however, was just half of the equation; the cost of maintaining this infrastructure is the other half, borne by all North Saanich taxpayers.
The unexpected increase to the Panorama pool expansion was another major impact on North Saanich taxpayers that will be reflected in next year's tax bill. At $12M, up from approximately $5.7M as cited in the 2005 North Saanich pool expansion referendum, it seems to me project management and planning for the pool had challenges related to spending control. Many North Saanich taxpayers I talked to have been concerned about this and again, capital cost is one thing but ongoing maintenance and operation are others. I also understand that staffing at Panorama has increased by about 50% as a result of opening the new pool and it is argued that a larger more complex facility needs more staff to run it. Having said that, many see the pool expansion as a community asset that will benefit social and recreational needs over time.
But at a time when the economy is still fragile and private and public sectors continue to make significant cuts, it's my view that adding staff in any organization can be a difficult decision to sell to taxpayers who have to foot the bills.
In my opinion, these are just two examples that demonstrate local government's fundamental responsibility to carefully manage or scale back big projects that may not be fully sustainable or affordable over time. Sustainable spending is one of the reasons why I supported the current North Saanich Council when it moved to cap at 5% this year's municipal tax increase. Further, I believe that this Council is taking a prudent approach to any new spending, asking staff to ensure, on behalf of North Saanich taxpayers, that whatever we do spend we can afford to sustain.
It was argued during the last municipal election that a cautious approach might mean that North Saanich would be "shut down," with comments such as "No Saanich" making the rounds. But in reality, I believe that North Saanich residents and taxpayers opted for a new Mayor and Council majority they believe will check spending, bring greater fiscal accountability to financial management and make sure that taxpayers are respected. The saying that best fits this Mayor and Council majority's approach may be simply "Ask North Saanich Taxpayers Before We Spend."
Results for other CRD municipalities varied between a low of 1.71 to a high of 8.62. Questions were raised in the article by some local Mayors about the validity and context of the data, given consistent provincial downloading to municipal governments during the past 8 or 9 years. It was argued that downloading programs and services negatively impacts local government's ability to meet and sustain demands, such as increased police services. Another factor is salaries paid to municipal staff that apparently average 35% higher than the private sector.
Financial issues and municipal spending are ongoing concerns of mine, especially for a municipality the size of North Saanich. Large infrastructure projects such as the new sewer system for Deep Cove/Pat Bay and McDonald Park Road was about a $15M bill that frankly should not have been imposed on taxpayers at a time when construction costs were at their highest and the real estate boom was at its peak. This capital cost, however, was just half of the equation; the cost of maintaining this infrastructure is the other half, borne by all North Saanich taxpayers.
The unexpected increase to the Panorama pool expansion was another major impact on North Saanich taxpayers that will be reflected in next year's tax bill. At $12M, up from approximately $5.7M as cited in the 2005 North Saanich pool expansion referendum, it seems to me project management and planning for the pool had challenges related to spending control. Many North Saanich taxpayers I talked to have been concerned about this and again, capital cost is one thing but ongoing maintenance and operation are others. I also understand that staffing at Panorama has increased by about 50% as a result of opening the new pool and it is argued that a larger more complex facility needs more staff to run it. Having said that, many see the pool expansion as a community asset that will benefit social and recreational needs over time.
But at a time when the economy is still fragile and private and public sectors continue to make significant cuts, it's my view that adding staff in any organization can be a difficult decision to sell to taxpayers who have to foot the bills.
In my opinion, these are just two examples that demonstrate local government's fundamental responsibility to carefully manage or scale back big projects that may not be fully sustainable or affordable over time. Sustainable spending is one of the reasons why I supported the current North Saanich Council when it moved to cap at 5% this year's municipal tax increase. Further, I believe that this Council is taking a prudent approach to any new spending, asking staff to ensure, on behalf of North Saanich taxpayers, that whatever we do spend we can afford to sustain.
It was argued during the last municipal election that a cautious approach might mean that North Saanich would be "shut down," with comments such as "No Saanich" making the rounds. But in reality, I believe that North Saanich residents and taxpayers opted for a new Mayor and Council majority they believe will check spending, bring greater fiscal accountability to financial management and make sure that taxpayers are respected. The saying that best fits this Mayor and Council majority's approach may be simply "Ask North Saanich Taxpayers Before We Spend."
Second Meeting on Marine Task Force Report Recommendations Calls for a Third Meeting
Citing the need to receive additional information on factors such as environmental impacts, re-zoning and jurisdictional issues related to building private docks on the waterfront, Council voted 6 to 1 against Councilor Sheilah Fea's motion to move ahead with private docks in North Saanich. I also agreed with the Council majority to defer to a third meeting the rest of the Marine Task Force (MTF) report's recommendations, including recommendation #7 related to private docks. A sometimes noisy waterfront group attended the October 29th Committee of the Whole special meeting, the second held by Council to address the MTF's 2008 report.
I knew going into these meetings that some recommendations would be controversial, particularly the recommendation dealing with private docks. As you know, North Saanich, since 1984, has restricted private docks, resulting in current Official Community Plan zoning limits known as M5 and M6. As a result, the North Saanich coastline is relatively unobstructed, making public access to our beaches and waterfront one of the attractions of living here -- I support public access to our beaches and will always try to find a balance between the need for public beach access and the desires of waterfront property owners.
As you know, some waterfront property owners disagree with North Saanich's current zoning restrictions for private docks, believing the municipality should allow private docks whenever a waterfront property owner makes an application. One waterfront owner at this week's meeting stated that he feels that it is his "right to have a private dock and unfettered access to deep water." But another waterfront property owner cautioned the municipality against allowing private docks that impede adjacent neighbours' sight lines and interfere with their views, acknowledging my belief that a significant factor that determines waterfront property values is the quality of the view.
Council also agreed to move ahead with the MTF's recommendation for a public boat launch on the West side of the Peninsula, below the airport. Mayor and Council plan to re-open talks with the Victoria Airport Authority, the Federal government and other community stakeholders to explore having a small public boat launch on the West side that provides vehicle parking and access for small boats, kayaks, canoes, etc. I understand from one resident who attended the meeting that Tulista Park will be one of the last small public boat launches left on the Peninsula, given that Van Isle Marina is rumoured to be closing its boat launch to allow expansion of a restaurant.
Regarding the MTF's recommendation on the Federal government's initiative to designate the Saanich Inlet a marine conservation area, Council agreed to invite Parks Canada to make a presentation to Council on the status of the initiative and on what impacts, if any, such a designation would have on waterfront property owners. Some owners express concern about a marine park/conservation area designation, suggesting that it might interfere with their property rights. We learned, however, thanks to Frances Pugh of the Saanich Inlet Protection Society, that a conservation area designation means only three things: no dumping, no dredging and no oil drilling. I can't imagine that the majority of North Saanich residents wouldn't wholeheartedly embrace such protection for the Saanich Inlet.
A new date for the next special Council meeting to address the MTF's report will be announced on the District website, in the District newsletter and I will ensure that the date is also announced on this blog. Stay tuned and watch for the date and time of the next meeting. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call or e-mail and I will try to answer your questions. Thank you.
Affordable Housing Levy Still a CRD Priority
As your North Saanich representative on the Regional Housing Trust Fund board, I was delighted to read in this week's Times-Colonist that the CRD Board wants to continue its affordable housing levy to support this special fund. North Saanich is a proud contributor to the Regional Housing Trust Fund, along with 11 other municipalities and, as the Times-Colonist reports, our participation helps to leverage contributions to build affordable housing.
For example, since 2005 when the initiative started, the fund has raised $3.5M which, through leveraging, has resulted in about $51M worth of affordable housing. It is reported that almost 281 units in 17 projects have been created in the capital region. It is amazing what a small municipality like North Saanich can do through an average $6.50 per household tax levy -- in 2009 alone, with the Town of Sidney coming on board this year, the fund is expected to generate $859,173 in contributions from a dozen municipalities. By the end of this year, reports suggest that amount will translate to $12.8M for affordable housing, leveraged through additional contributions from senior governments, community groups and the private sector.
When anyone states that North Saanich does nothing for affordable housing, don't you believe it. We are part of a special initiative that proves once again that small communities are capable of doing the "heavy lifting" to support important social programs. Thank you North Saanich taxpayers for your continued support!
If you would like further information about the Regional Housing Trust Fund, please contact me.
Heavy Traffic at McTavish Road Interchange Open House
It was standing room only last week when I dropped down to the McTavish Road Interchange Open House, hosted for local residents by the Provincial government, as part of its public consultation process. Local residents, North Saanich , Sidney and Central Saanich Council members, Victoria Airport Authority staff, project staff from the Province and other transportation staff mingled and chatted with the public as people poured into the Presbyterian Church at East Saanich Road
Comments on the project that I heard ranged from "too big and too complex for this area" to "too expensive when we are cutting everything else in this Province" to "we need the improvements for safety's sake" and "it's about time we did something at this intersection." I also heard some anxiety about drivers having to negotiate the roundabouts, which I agree can be daunting.
I remember well my first driving experience in
In general, my impression of public reaction during my visit to the Open House was that most people, while not wildly enthusiastic, were more accepting of recent modifications made to the design. Despite public concerns about cost and scope (which I appreciate), residents I talked to that day seemed to recognize that efforts had been made by provincial transportation planners to incorporate some of the public's feedback on design and to make subsequent changes.
Beyond original concerns about the finished product and its suitability to this area, people I spoke to have concerns about impacts during the construction phase, including road closures, re-routed traffic along East Saanich Road, emergency vehicle access to Lochside Drive and noise. I share these concerns as does the Mayor of
I want to stress, once again, that the District of North Saanich is not a contributing partner to this Interchange. YES, we supported in principle last year the Victoria Airport Authority's original request to make safety and access improvements at McTavish and the
Having said that, I can assure you that the District of North Saanich is concerned about how construction impacts will be managed until the project is completed. I understand that Mayor and Council will remain involved on your behalf through our McTavish Interchange Task Force. For questions, comments or more information, please contact your Interchange Task Force community representatives, Heather Gartshore at 250-656-0974 or Bob Williamson at 250-655-1270. And at anytime, please feel free to contact me directly (as well as other Council members) with your concerns. Thank you!
A New Perspective From a Different Sector
I encourage you to read the attached opinion piece that appeared in the Times-Colonist October 22, 2009. It gives a new and different perspective on the argument that land use focused on conservation and preservation, particularly of trees, is good for human health and a defense against the negative impacts of climate change. Articles about land use are normally authored by environmentalists, planners, developers or politicians. But this article is written by someone from a sector that knows a lot about human health -- doctors. This is definitely worth a read. Visit the T/C website: http://www.timescolonist.com
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE ON THE PENINSULA CELEBRATES 10 YEARS
As the new Council Liaison to Peninsula Crossroads, the Saanich Peninsula's restorative justice program, I had the pleasure of attending on October 21, 2009 their AGM, celebrating 10 years of work on the Peninsula. Funded by the three Peninsula municipalities and operating under the Beacon Community Services' umbrella, this group does amazing work to support the values, principles and practices of restorative justice by bringing the offender and offended together for the purposes of restorative justice and restitution.
The fragile relationship between the offended and the offender is carefully managed through supportive individual and group counselling conducted by volunteers trained in restorative justice philosophy and practices. Peninsula Crossroads also works with a variety of community partners including the Central Saanich Police, Sidney and North Saanich RCMP, School District #63 and the individual school administrators of School District #63 schools. School District #63 was specifically recognized by outgoing Chair Liz Cox as a model school district that embraces and reflects the practices and goals of restorative justice at each of its schools.
The new Chair of the Board of Directors is Allan Collier, long time restorative justice volunteer and recently elected School District #63 Trustee.
Attending the AGM was, for me, like old home week. I renewed acquaintances with some of my former friends and colleagues from my early career as Probation Officer and Family Court Counsellor in Victoria and I met North Saanich volunteers who work with this organization. While the District of North Saanich provides annual funding of approximately $2,000 through a Grant in Aid, it's clear to me that North Saanich volunteers who contribute their time and energy to this group, prove once again that their tremendous volunteer commitments are even more valuable than dollars and cents.
On behalf of the District of North Saanich, I look forward to working with and supporting Peninsula Crossroads. If you are interested in becoming a volunteer (they need school volunteers), please contact the organization through the Sidney/North Saanich RCMP office at 250-656-3931 during business hours.
The McTavish Road Interchange Project
I have been asked by our North Saanich community appointees to the McTavish Road Interchange Committee (Heather Gartshore and Bob Williamson) to post this following letter regarding the project. You can also get further information from the Ministry of Transportation's website at http://www.th.gov.bc.ca/highwayprojects/Hwy_17_McTavish_Interchange/index.htm
We wanted to let you know that we have been appointed by the District of North Saanich Council, as the two community representatives to to sit on the McTavish Road Interchange Task Force. Other members include representatives from North Saanich Staff and Council, Sidney Council, the Victoria Airport Authority, the RCMP, the Tseycum and Pauquachin First Nations and the Ministry of Transportation.
The purpose of the Task Force is to maintain consultation and dialogue with groups and individuals to identify and address community concerns during the detailed design and construction of the McTavish Road Interchange. We will represent community interests primarily in the geographic area bounded approximately by Amity Drive to the south, Dean Park to the west, Beacon Avenue to the north and Lochside Drive to the east, however we will accept comment from the community in general.
The BC Ministry of Transportation is proceeding with this project to improve safety, enhance transit and improve access to the Victoria International Airport. While we understand that you may have concerns about the design, timing and cost of this project, the Task Force is not in a position to consider those.
This is a Provincial project on Provincial land and as such, the Province can proceed. To qualify for supporting funds from the Federal Government, the project must be completed by March 2011.
After considering alternatives, the conceptual design comprising two roundabouts and a road bridge over the main highway has been complete and has now been accepted as the final design. The design contract has been awarded to a consulting engineering firm who will proceed with the detailed design. No fundamental changes can be made to the concept.
Citizens can provide input on bicycle paths, pedestrian paths, signage, landscaping, noise abatement and pollution control, but not on the design concept itself. On site construction activity is expected to commence as soon as October 2009.
As your community representatives, we would be pleased to communicate your concerns, suggestions and comments on topics where we can still exert some influence as the McTavish Road Interchange moves to the next phase.
The Task Force will be meeting at regularly scheduled intervals. You will find the project website at: http://www.th.gov.bc.ca/highwayprojects/Hwy_17_McTavish_Interchange/index.htm
Please feel free to pass this information along to friends and neighbors who will also be impacted by the McTavish Road Interchange.
Heather Gartshore heathergartshore@shaw.ca 250-656-0974
Bob Williamson prismoid@islandnet.com 250-655-1270
Marine Task Force Report Well Anchored
After first receiving the Marine Task Force (MTF) report last year (commissioned by the District of North Saanich in 2007), the former Mayor and Council accepted the report and its sixteen recommendations but voted to defer any action on the recommendations until after the municipal election in November 2008. Nearly a year later, the current Council has breathed new life into the report and planned two meetings (October 13 and 29, 2009 at 7:00 PM in Council Chambers) to address MTF recommendations and action items and to involve the public in these debates. The following highlights the results of our first meeting on October 13th.
An audience of about 45 to 50 people attended the October 13th Committee of the Whole Meeting, representing the general public, waterfront property owners, former Marine Task Force members and representatives of environmental groups and interested organizations. Using a September 2008 staff report to guide Council deliberations, we debated roughly half of the sixteen recommendations and carried the rest over to the next meeting on October 29th. My view is that despite some potentially contentious issues, the meeting proceeded well and the audience was respectful and fully engaged.
The meeting was opened by the former Task Force Chair, Graham Williams who provided us with a brief overview and background on some of the report's key recommendations. Council then discussed briefly how we should proceed, finally deciding to deal with each of the recommendations separately and in order. At first, I was concerned about the process of tackling these recommendations and wanted to avoid getting bogged down in minute detail and putting our audience to sleep. Other Council members agreed so we kept focused on the general recommendations, opting to attack the detail at our next meeting.
Debate was thorough and members of the audience were keen to participate in discussion on following:
Better recognize marine heritage, economic contributions and boating interests (staff directed to prepare a report for Council on anticipated changes to the Official Community Plan (OCP), suggested policy changes, development of community values related to recreation and environmental impacts and inclusion in the OCP of shoreline maps provided in the recently completely Saanich Inlet and Peninsula Atlas of Shorelines 2009 Public Report;
Meet with local marina industry representatives to explore options for improved capacity related to recreational boating and development (includes options for dry land boat storage);
Agree to keep OCP boatshed regulations the same but also agree to discuss other boatshed options with marina industry that might reduce moorage costs but increase capacity;
Guidelines for private docks (M5 vs. M6 zones).
The most contentious of these four items is the issue of guidelines for private docks. Waterfront property owners who attended the meeting are fiercely protective of their property rights -- some PRPA members (a North Saanich waterfront property owners' group) even suggested that the District should change its policy on M6 zoning so that private docks are allowed in North Saanich. Such a change would represent a major departure from the North Saanich Official Community Plan.
In the end, Council acknowledged that this Mayor and Council must first decide whether to open up this debate at all, a discussion that may be brought to a later meeting. I am reminded by other North Saanich taxpayers that while waterfront property owners have strong feelings about their riparian rights, the North Saanich waterfront is also a significant environmental asset to all North Saanich residents who live and pay taxes here. Many residents have asked that we protect and preserve the waterfront wherever possible.
In conclusion, I believe that when citizens make time to attend our meetings, we need to ensure that information and processes are "user friendly," meaning that discussions are well understood and information is readily provided. Granted, some of our discussion seemed a bit dry and drawn out and I noticed members of the audience drifting out of the Chamber before the end of the meeting. Others noted that we tended to use acronyms they did not recognize and referenced documents not provided to the audience for their information. These concerns of "using too much jargon" and "not providing some reference materials to the public" were duly noted. I have in fact today requested copies of our OCP and the original MTF report be provided at our October 29th meeting for people to see and share.
The debate will continue on October 29, 2009 when Council re-convenes in the Council Chamber at 7:00 pm to continue its review of the MTF report and the rest of the recommendations. Please try to attend this important meeting and join the discussion on how best to establish a balance between marine economic development and environmental protection of our marine habitat.
An audience of about 45 to 50 people attended the October 13th Committee of the Whole Meeting, representing the general public, waterfront property owners, former Marine Task Force members and representatives of environmental groups and interested organizations. Using a September 2008 staff report to guide Council deliberations, we debated roughly half of the sixteen recommendations and carried the rest over to the next meeting on October 29th. My view is that despite some potentially contentious issues, the meeting proceeded well and the audience was respectful and fully engaged.
The meeting was opened by the former Task Force Chair, Graham Williams who provided us with a brief overview and background on some of the report's key recommendations. Council then discussed briefly how we should proceed, finally deciding to deal with each of the recommendations separately and in order. At first, I was concerned about the process of tackling these recommendations and wanted to avoid getting bogged down in minute detail and putting our audience to sleep. Other Council members agreed so we kept focused on the general recommendations, opting to attack the detail at our next meeting.
Debate was thorough and members of the audience were keen to participate in discussion on following:
Better recognize marine heritage, economic contributions and boating interests (staff directed to prepare a report for Council on anticipated changes to the Official Community Plan (OCP), suggested policy changes, development of community values related to recreation and environmental impacts and inclusion in the OCP of shoreline maps provided in the recently completely Saanich Inlet and Peninsula Atlas of Shorelines 2009 Public Report;
Meet with local marina industry representatives to explore options for improved capacity related to recreational boating and development (includes options for dry land boat storage);
Agree to keep OCP boatshed regulations the same but also agree to discuss other boatshed options with marina industry that might reduce moorage costs but increase capacity;
Guidelines for private docks (M5 vs. M6 zones).
The most contentious of these four items is the issue of guidelines for private docks. Waterfront property owners who attended the meeting are fiercely protective of their property rights -- some PRPA members (a North Saanich waterfront property owners' group) even suggested that the District should change its policy on M6 zoning so that private docks are allowed in North Saanich. Such a change would represent a major departure from the North Saanich Official Community Plan.
In the end, Council acknowledged that this Mayor and Council must first decide whether to open up this debate at all, a discussion that may be brought to a later meeting. I am reminded by other North Saanich taxpayers that while waterfront property owners have strong feelings about their riparian rights, the North Saanich waterfront is also a significant environmental asset to all North Saanich residents who live and pay taxes here. Many residents have asked that we protect and preserve the waterfront wherever possible.
In conclusion, I believe that when citizens make time to attend our meetings, we need to ensure that information and processes are "user friendly," meaning that discussions are well understood and information is readily provided. Granted, some of our discussion seemed a bit dry and drawn out and I noticed members of the audience drifting out of the Chamber before the end of the meeting. Others noted that we tended to use acronyms they did not recognize and referenced documents not provided to the audience for their information. These concerns of "using too much jargon" and "not providing some reference materials to the public" were duly noted. I have in fact today requested copies of our OCP and the original MTF report be provided at our October 29th meeting for people to see and share.
The debate will continue on October 29, 2009 when Council re-convenes in the Council Chamber at 7:00 pm to continue its review of the MTF report and the rest of the recommendations. Please try to attend this important meeting and join the discussion on how best to establish a balance between marine economic development and environmental protection of our marine habitat.
No Price Tag on Democracy
In the last few weeks, a story out of Central Saanich suggests that something is not sitting well with some
As a sitting Council member here in
Ordinary citizens interested in making a meaningful contribution to their local community through public service as an elected official, face the reality that running for public office costs money; without donations, the possibility of incurring all the costs personally can make a difference for some between running and not running. Access to funding should not be a barrier to standing as a municipal candidate -- for me, such a barrier does not serve the best interests of the public, our local communities or the election process, and excludes potentially good people from holding public office.
While I do think that the issue of slate candidates changed local election campaigning in North Saanich, certainly between 2002 and now, I also believe that
I believe that municipal elections should be regulated by Elections BC and that campaign financing and funding should be capped at 20% of whatever the individual stipend is for each Council position. The capping based on percentage is an idea put forward by North Saanich Council member Peter Chandler. It works like this: If a Councilor position in
If an elector organization, campaign organizer or individual endorses a slate of candidates, then donations are limited in the same way. It is a simple formula that levels the playing field and protects the integrity of the municipal election process that, otherwise, could be vulnerable to abuse.
Capping and regulating campaign financing/funding also prevents a "quid pro quo" situation, where special interest groups, organizers or individuals expect to have special influence on Council members making decisions. The mentality that says "I donated heavily to your campaign for a reason, now I expect a return on my investment," is one that we simply cannot afford to encourage, tolerate or ignore. Such a negative climate, whether real or perceived, compromises democracy and further reinforces the public's belief that the political process is somehow dishonest or corrupt. Sadly, that perception hurts all of us and damages our electoral and democratic processes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
